david, is mfgo-12-0805-2c really over 400 ELO better than mfgo-11, as cgos seems to suggest? or is mfgo11 still rising up into place?
thanks, s. On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 8:51 AM, David Fotland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First, thank you very much, Don, for giving us a reliable 19x19 server. > > Please consider increasing the time a program stays on the list until it > ages off. I guess you drop programs from the ratings page after some time > that depends on the number of games they have played. Since 19x19 games > take 4 times longs, it seems you should allow four times as much time to age > off the list, for the same number of games. I like seeing the top program's > results a little longer. > > It would be nice if a program can get into position more quickly. Since the > games take longer, it can take several days to climb up from the initial > 1200 to 2000, especially if there is an early loos. Does it make sense to > set the initial k value a little higher, or to set the initial rating to > 1500 instead of 1200? > > -David > > > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
