I'm very much looking forward to your sharing your progress with us. Perhaps you could give some more concrete examples of what you have done already; i.e. where you have moved from the messy human linguistic/cognitive "principles" to something much more formal?
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 2:23 AM, Robert Jasiek <jas...@snafu.de> wrote: > On 10.09.2015 08:24, David Fotland wrote: > >> I would say rather, that expert systems are dead in Go because many smart >> and talented people, including professional experts, worked diligently for >> two decades on this approach and none were able to get stronger than about >> 5 kyu. This is a strong experimental result, not an opinion. >> > > This says nothing about the potential of expert systems when done right. > General talent, professional expert system designers or professional > players are insufficient. What is needed is a very good understanding of go > theory on all topics of go theory as expert system knowledge. > > > -- > robert jasiek > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > Computer-go@computer-go.org > http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go >
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
