Actually chess software is much, much better. I recall that today's software 
running on 1998 hardware beats 1998 software running on today's hardware.

It was very soon after 1998 that ordinary PCs could play on a par with world 
champions.

-----Original Message-----
From: Computer-go [mailto:computer-go-boun...@computer-go.org] On Behalf Of 
?????????????? ???????
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 7:18 AM
To: computer-go@computer-go.org
Subject: Re: [Computer-go] AlphaGo & DCNN: Handling long-range dependency

I think that a desktop computer's calculating power appear to develop to a 
necessary level sooner then the algorithm may be optimized to use the power 
nowdays available. For example, I belive that chess programs run on a desktop 
well not because of a new better algotrithm but because the Deep Blue's 11.38 
GFLOP power is available on desktop from about 2006, in ten years only. So I 
think the speculation that Deep Mind will change the objective to a more 
advanced task is right :)

Dmitry

11.03.2016, 14:28, "Darren Cook" <dar...@dcook.org>:
>>>  global, more long-term planning. A rumour so far suggests to have 
>>> used the
>>>  time for more learning, but I'd be surprised if this should have sufficed.
>>
>>  My personal hypothesis so far is that it might - the REINFORCE might
>>  scale amazingly well and just continuous application of it...
>
> Agreed. What they have built is a training data generator, that can 
> churn out 9-dan level moves, 24 hours a day. Over the years I've had 
> to throw away so many promising ideas because they came down to 
> needing a 9-dan pro to, say, do the tedious job of ranking all legal 
> moves in each test position.
>
> What I'm hoping Deep Mind will do next is study how to maintain the 
> same level but using less hardware, until they can shrink it down to 
> run on, say, a high-end desktop computer. The knowledge gained 
> obviously has a clear financial benefit just in running costs, and 
> computer-go is a nice objective domain to measure progress. (But the 
> cynic in me suspects they'll just move to the next bright and shiny AI 
> problem.)
>
> Darren
>
> _______________________________________________
> Computer-go mailing list
> Computer-go@computer-go.org
> http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

Reply via email to