Fair enough On Mar 30, 2016 5:20 PM, "Brian Sheppard" <sheppar...@aol.com> wrote:
> This is out of line, IMO. Djhbrown asked a sensible question that has > valuable intentions. I would like to see responsible, thoughtful, and > constructive replies. > > > > *From:* Computer-go [mailto:computer-go-boun...@computer-go.org] *On > Behalf Of *uurtamo . > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 30, 2016 7:43 PM > *To:* computer-go <computer-go@computer-go.org> > *Subject:* Re: [Computer-go] new challenge for Go programmers > > > > He cannot possibly write code > > On Mar 30, 2016 4:38 PM, "Jim O'Flaherty" <jim.oflaherty...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I don't think djhbrown is a software engineer. And he seems to have the > most fits. :) > > > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 6:37 PM, uurtamo . <uurt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This is clearly the alphago final laugh; make an email list responder to > send programmers into fits. > > s. > > On Mar 30, 2016 4:16 PM, "djhbrown ." <djhbr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > thank you very much Ben for sharing the inception work, which may well > open the door to a new avenue of AI research. i am particularly > impressed by one pithy statement the authors make: > > "We must go deeper: Iterations" > > i remember as an undergrad being impressed by the expressive power of > recursive functions, and later by the iterative quality of biological > growth and its fractal nature. > > seeing animals in clouds is a bit like seeing geta in a go position; > so maybe one way to approach the problem of chatting with a CNN might > be to seek correlations between convolution weights and successive > stone configurations that turn up time and time again in games. > > it may be that some kind of iterative procedure could do this, just as > my iterative procedure for circumscribing a group has a recursive > quality to its definition. > > all you need then is to give such a correlation a name, and you will > be on the way to discovering a new language for talking about Go. > > > On 31/03/2016, Ben <ben_computer...@hemio.de> wrote: > > It would be very interesting to see what these go playing neural > > networks dream about [1]. > > [1] > > > http://googleresearch.blogspot.de/2015/06/inceptionism-going-deeper-into-neural.html > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > Computer-go@computer-go.org > http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go > > > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > Computer-go@computer-go.org > http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > Computer-go@computer-go.org > http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go > > > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > Computer-go@computer-go.org > http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go >
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
