Agreed, this was the reason for my last statement in my post.
Stats can be shown to say anything depending on who's doing the
interpreting. And how they spin the info. The last 7 years should be a
prime example of that for any university class on the subject.
Jeff M
On Jan 11, 2008, at 5:48 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
You can always quote whatever statistics you want, but unless you
know how those were gathered and then how they are being interpreted
they are just numbers.
Stewart
At 07:18 PM 1/11/2008, you wrote:
Again, interesting how stats
can muddy the waters of a discussion.
Jeff M
************************************************************************
* ==> QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in <==
* ==> the body of an email & send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
************************************************************************
* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header "X-No-Archive: yes" will not be archived
************************************************************************
