Coverage isn't an issue where I live, not enough of one to force me into one carrier. I'm already with tmobile so obviously coverage is not my concern. My concern are cost and the quality of access to the internet from the handset and then coverage. The touchscreen phones are the only ones with above average browsing experience, right now it's iphone or the palm or perhaps android. Opera on WM on an HTC handset is a possibility.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:08 PM, b_s-wilk <b1sun...@yahoo.es> wrote: > On Aug 4, 2009, at 2:21 PM, mike wrote: > >> Ok, this coming October I was pretty much set on the iPhone..the apps, >>> full >>> HTML browsing etc was worth going to AT$T. At least from what I know. >>> >> > Which phone company has the best reception where you live and travel? That > should determine your choice. > > I don't like any of those phones, including iPhone, but for $99 why not an > HTC--T-Mobile has been using them successfully for a few years. Maybe you > can haggle to get the price down like I did at T-Mo. If I had a choice, I'd > get a Nokia with WiFi, but I doubt Verizon has them. WiFi is nice. > Touchscreen is nice, but not a deal-breaker. Besides, I already have an iPod > Touch. > > Does ATT cover better in AZ [aren't you in AZ?] than in SoCal? Coverage is > most important, unless you plan to carry two phones. > > Betty > > > > ************************************************************************* > ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** > ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** > ************************************************************************* > ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
