Keep changing the subject Tom. Never answer the question. Pretend no one notices you can dance with the best.
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:57 AM, tjpa <t...@tjpa.com> wrote: > On Nov 29, 2009, at 1:09 PM, John Duncan Yoyo wrote: > >> Apple made a mess of this process early on. They didn't make the rules >> clear early on and then keep spring secret criterea for failing things. >> > > Yes they did and they are struggling with the burden. Should they be > faulted for not being prepared for 10,000 submissions a week? What is the > precedent? How many Google Gadgets or Microsoft Gadgets are there? Who would > have known? > > How many apps a day should a worker be able to review and follow up on? Say > they process 4 a day or 20 a week. That means Apple needs to have a staff of > at least 500 people just reviewing apps. Add to this various support people > and managers and it is probably close to 1,000 people that Apple has to > supply for this free service. > > Only a hopelessly biased WFB could be critical of Apple's efforts. M$ > doesn't do anything like this. > > > > ************************************************************************* > ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** > ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** > ************************************************************************* > ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
