Stephen Warren wrote: > Phil Dibowitz wrote: >> Stephen, >> >> Have you been looking at any of the firmware-on-525 stuff? I've poured over >> it several times and sent several debug patches to folks and looked through >> the dumps a lot... > > I haven't looked at it at all. I thought the thing you were missing was > answered by Kevin (the mystery bytes were the serial number or something > like that.)
The fact that it was just the UID (his comment) was correct. It also meant that I was barking up the wrong tree. =( It doesn't show how they're telling the remote about the new version number. > However, if that wasn't the whole thing, I can probably find time to try > to look at it. Cool, thanks. -- Phil Dibowitz p...@ipom.com Open Source software and tech docs Insanity Palace of Metallica http://www.phildev.net/ http://www.ipom.com/ "Never write it in C if you can do it in 'awk'; Never do it in 'awk' if 'sed' can handle it; Never use 'sed' when 'tr' can do the job; Never invoke 'tr' when 'cat' is sufficient; Avoid using 'cat' whenever possible" -- Taylor's Laws of Programming
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________ concordance-devel mailing list concordance-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/concordance-devel
