Phil Dibowitz wrote: > Phil Dibowitz wrote: >> Hmmm. OK, well, there's no difference in the actual write-out of the flash >> this time. That's good. I guess. >> >> That leaves a much smaller part of the logs to analyze... > > Phew. > > OK, so the differences left are pretty small. The most obvious one is the > read of 48 bytes at 0x200010. > > Apply this patch, and attempt a firmware upgrade. It'll exit before it ever > does the firmware upgrade and will write out a binary file to /tmp/tout. > > Take /tmp/tout, bzip2 it up and email it to me. > > I'll forward it off to Stephen and Kevin as well - they're better at reverse > engineering that stuff than I am... but I'll take a crack at it.
Either you forgot to forward it to us, or I lost it... I guess it'd best to forward me all the debug logs that are currently available. BTW, I have a 10M email size limit on my system. I have a Linux group meeting Tue night, so I could try looking at it then. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ concordance-devel mailing list concordance-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/concordance-devel
