I'm not sure Robert's strategy should be legal. It never honestly occurred to me that anyone would try to do that. For that reason, I am toying with the idea of just counting his first (highest) vote, which right now would still yield the same result. I think that meets everyone's expectations appropriately.
As for revoting to boost one result upwards, that's perfectly valid, as long as we don't devolve into indefinite rounds of revoting. ;-) Karl On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/2/10 8:21 AM, Karl Wright wrote: > > You have until 5 PM Friday to tally your final vote. > > > > Bear in mind, however, that changing your vote to achieve a desired > outcome > > may well cause others to change their votes to counteract your move. So > I > > urge people to change your vote ONLY if you want to add Apache Datasource > > Connectors into your list somewhere. > > > > Karl > > > > It's probably a fair move though - I doubt Jack realized how the votes > would be tallied (eg that Roberts vote would have so much weight for one > name). I had no clue - the original vote sounded like you needed to pick > 3 different options and didn't explain how those options would count > towards the final name. So it seems fair that he change it, right? > > - Mark >
