Hi Daniel,
The orignal code assumes that the builtin chain is empty which is obviously always the right assumption :).
That is actually the bug in the original code: it might not be empty. If it is, it does the right change, if not it modifies the 1 rule in the chain.
Tomasz _______________________________________________ connman mailing list connman@connman.net http://lists.connman.net/listinfo/connman
