Hi Tomasz,
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Tomasz Bursztyka < tomasz.burszt...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > Hi Julien, > > > Often they think they remove all the favorite networks in the UI list, >> and they don't understand that some networks are still stored. >> > > What do they want to do? Selectively removing some known networks, or > removing all known ones? > If it's the later, a small script could just do that for them. Both could be great. > > > Sometimes it results in unwanted wifi passphrase leaks, >> > > How come? The passphrase are stored in a restricted directory in > /var/lib/connman > If someone/something can read there, the machine is corrupted anyway. I was not clear here, when giving the device to someone else we need a way to be sure networks are deleted, Or often they give the device without removing all the networks. Of course it's only possible with the root account (which is not disabled on device of my company). I saw a lot of passphrases since the begining :) > > > or connection to a no longer wanted network. >> > > Well they can fix that then at that point, via un-favoriting the network > at that point. ;) Yes but If we can avoid that, it could be nice, my devices have no screen, every thing concerning configuration is complicated. (Plug ethernet, go on the configuration web page with another computer, un-favorite the network and connect to the new one) > > The naive way of thinking is to return these networks with >> GetServices method of net.connman.Manager interface. >> > > Imagine the mess: you might have 20 networks available + how many > unreachable ones? > It's even more confusing than the current situation, as you noticed > already. > > > These services may required a new "unreachable" state. >> >> Does someone already think about a possible implementation for this use >> case ? >> > > This has been discussed already, and yet nothing proper has been specified. > > Something like a new Manager method, to get the unreachable known networks, > with a possibility to remove them. A "StoredService" object or kind of, > with only readable > properties and one method Remove(). > > It's not like it would make the UI very nice anyway, that's the main > reason I guess this > issue hasn't been resolved. > Yes I know, it's why I haven't do anything at the moment. > Tomasz > _______________________________________________ > connman mailing list > connman@connman.net > https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman > Thanks, Julien _______________________________________________ connman mailing list connman@connman.net https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman
