Hi,


On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Pasi Sjöholm <pasi.sjoh...@jolla.com>
wrote:

> >> -#define BGSCAN_DEFAULT "simple:30:-45:300"
> >> +#define BGSCAN_DEFAULT "simple:30:-65:300"
> > On which devices has this been tested? Do you know whether the reported
> > threshold is reported equally across these devices?
>
> I've several laptops and phones which seem to report the "same" RSSI
> levels by running "wpa_cli scan && wpa_cli scan_result" but in the end the
> wpa_s trusts the data coming from the wlan-driver.
>
> To be honest this setting does not affect devices in which the wlan-driver
> is responsible for roaming as then wpa_s will not do bgscan with those (you
> will see wpa_s reporting "nl80211: Using driver-based roaming" then).
>
> The main point is that the -45dBm is considered very good RSSI-value and
> we should not be scanning unnecessarily as scanning will block other
> operations. Can't say if -65dBm is the _correct_ value but it's better than
> -45dBm.
>
> Br,
> Pasi
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> connman mailing list
> connman@connman.net
> https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman
>
_______________________________________________
connman mailing list
connman@connman.net
https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman

Reply via email to