Hi,
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Pasi Sjöholm <pasi.sjoh...@jolla.com> wrote: > >> -#define BGSCAN_DEFAULT "simple:30:-45:300" > >> +#define BGSCAN_DEFAULT "simple:30:-65:300" > > On which devices has this been tested? Do you know whether the reported > > threshold is reported equally across these devices? > > I've several laptops and phones which seem to report the "same" RSSI > levels by running "wpa_cli scan && wpa_cli scan_result" but in the end the > wpa_s trusts the data coming from the wlan-driver. > > To be honest this setting does not affect devices in which the wlan-driver > is responsible for roaming as then wpa_s will not do bgscan with those (you > will see wpa_s reporting "nl80211: Using driver-based roaming" then). > > The main point is that the -45dBm is considered very good RSSI-value and > we should not be scanning unnecessarily as scanning will block other > operations. Can't say if -65dBm is the _correct_ value but it's better than > -45dBm. > On my devices I'm really happy with -45 dBm (rt2x00usb devices, and ath6kl usb devices). I start to be in trouble at -70dBm, so I also decide to reduce the threshold to -65dBm. https://github.com/aldebaran/connman/commit/278780b2cff48f0a9e9a46d54ffafe384167249e Regards, Julien _______________________________________________ connman mailing list connman@connman.net https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman
