On 09/09/2015 04:41 PM, Gianfranco Casanova wrote: > Even having the configuration of Session overwriting the ConnMan, > which is the order that has to be considered by the ConnMan for the > AllowedBarer? > I do not see any PRIO in the policy file, I’m right?
As I said this was left out on purpose. The session_policy_local.c plugin is only providing basic functionality. > If the two routes are present and a session connect is required > (online the one with less PRIO from AllowedBarer point of view), > what’s happen? There are many good questions how to handle such situations. If you have a real product in mind you can probably easy tell. Finding a generic solution is a bit harder. That's why we have the session plugins. _______________________________________________ connman mailing list connman@connman.net https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman
