Hi everyone, Just wanted to point out that this was certainly not the original intent behind GNU Consensus (or is it something else that we are discussing it?)
If we are really going into that direction for the scope of GNU Consensus, then there’s no point in having “Terms of Service; Didn’t Read” listed as a supporting organisation (why the heck would we need terms for then? we would just have software licenses) I haven’t participated much recently, but I’m a bit concerned on how the goal of GNU Consensus has been defined. This was certainly not what I was looking into participating, for the mere reason that there’s little I can do in the direction this is taking. I suppose I’ll also unsubscribe from the list, I don’t really see what I can contribute. Best wishes and good luck, Best, Hugo -- Hugo Roy | Free Software Foundation Europe, www.fsfe.org FSFE Legal Team, Deputy Coordinator, www.fsfe.org/legal FSFE French Team, Coordinator, www.fsfe.org/fr/ Support Free Software, sign up! https://fsfe.org/support
