Hi, Becky,
This is one that without a good visual to know exactly what this means, I'm not 
sure I like this.  The reason why people are taught to put a hand on the 
shoulder blade is that the shoulder blade is a good solid part of the body to 
put a flat hand and provide the weight to go around in a satisfying swing.  I 
can't imagine this "hand above elbow" thing.  I *have* seen the hand below 
elbow thing, though, but I feel that putting weight on the elbow is more likely 
to cause injury than on the shoulder blade, especially if you are pushing 
upwards on a bent elbow.  I'm guessing that what you are describing is 
something different than I am imagining.  
As for the boob problem, that is something that I feel can be solved by good 
swing technique.  My main issue is when you swing, the hips should be side to 
side, but the torso is should still be somewhat square so that my arm doesn't 
go across the breast.  And as a man I make great effort not to brush against 
anyone's breast by going around as best as I can, by going all the way around 
to the back of the shoulder.  And those times when I do brush against the 
breast, I apologize profusely, and most people are understanding, as the 
apology shows that I'm not there to grope.  

I *think* a lot of people can tell the difference between a grope and accident, 
but I'm probably wrong about this.  I'd like to hear some more thoughts from 
other people on this.  It would be good to know what to do to help prevent 
accidental boob touching.  
Perry
    On Wednesday, March 13, 2024 at 10:17:30 AM EDT, Becky Liddle via Contra 
Callers <contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:  
 
 In the discussion about some men being uncomfortable doing ballroom dance hold 
swing with other men, the modified ballroom hold (hand above elbow of partner 
instead of on robin’s shoulder) was mentioned. 
In this discussion, much has been said about men who don’t want to do ballroom 
hold with other men, but what nobody has mentioned yet is the scads of women 
(both straight and queer) who have long been uncomfortable dancing ballroom 
swing with men (or often just with particular men). I am intrigued by this 
modified ballroom swing idea because it might solve many problems at once. 
I have two simultaneous (and conflicting) emotional responses to men 
uncomfortable swinging with other men:The ungenerous one is: "As a lesbian I 
had to get over my discomfort swinging with you in order to participate in the 
joy of contra. If I can do it, you can do it." But more importantly (and more 
generously): We’d like everyone to be as comfortable at contra dances as is 
reasonably feasible. To that end, I am very interested in this idea of the 
modified ballroom hold. It might solve MANY different problems. Here are a few 
that come to mind:
1. The enforced intimacy problem: this is not just a problem with straight men 
being uncomfortable swinging with other men. There is a lot of forced intimacy 
in the ballroom hold. Maybe that intimacy is not the best thing to force on 
anyone?. Modified ballroom swing would help with the problem of not wanting 
enforced closeness/intimacy with others for all kinds of reasons: keeping 
distance from the lecherous dancer who uses the ballroom hold as an excuse for 
unwanted intimacy; but also simply to provide a bit of space for folks who 
simply aren’t comfortable being that close to ANYBODY. I recently struck up a 
conversation with a new dancer who was leaving early (because we need to know 
why we’re losing potential dancers) and she said “It just feels too intimate.” 
She didn’t say too intimate swinging with men or with women. Just “too 
intimate” and I got the definite feeling that it was the enforced close hold 
(with everyone) that was difficult for her. I wonder if we would have lost her 
if we used the modified ballroom swing (hand above elbow instead of on 
shoulder). 
2. There are other difficulties with the ballroom hold: sometimes there is 
simply not enough room: short arms or large girth can make it difficult to 
reach the back of the shoulder of the other partner at times, and this leaves 
the Lark in the uncomfortable/dangerous position of “where do I put my hand 
now?” While trying to avoid the “accidental side boob graze” issue. 
3. Speaking of which, is nobody else out there having trouble with this “side 
boob graze” problem with the ballroom hold? I’m a lesbian who dances the Lark 
role because of knee and hip issues. At least once/evening when moving into or 
out of the ballroom hold I accidentally graze the side of my partner’s breast. 
If I were straight I wouldn’t worry about it. But as a lesbian my mind always 
leaps to “what if she thinks I did that on purpose?” Do straight men not also 
have this problem?? Why is nobody talking about this?? If the robin is 
female-presenting, the back of the robin’s shoulder is dangerously close to the 
side of her breast. Which means (a) it’s easy for a sleaze to cop a feel and 
pass it off as an accident, and (b) it’s easy for a lesbian or straight man to 
truly accidentally graze and then worry that they’ll be perceived as a sleaze. 
The elbow hold would solve both of these problems. 
4. The robin clamping down their arm problem: Larks, have you ever danced with 
a robin who clamps down their arm on your wrist during the swing? Again, elbow 
hold would solve this.
5. The problem of robins dancing backwards when swinging: I have never danced 
the modified ballroom hold, but I’d like to know from folks who do: does it 
solve the problem of many robins feeling like they need to dance backwards when 
swinging? On the occasions when I do dance robin (usually because I’m pairing 
with a newbie who is dancing lark) I often find myself skittering backwards in 
the swing, instead of both of us walking/dancing forward. I’m not experienced 
enough as a robin to fully understand this phenomenon, but I think it has to do 
with the closeness and rigidity of some Larks’ hold in the ballroom swing. 
Question for folks who have used the elbow hold: does this hold solve this 
problem and allow the robin to dance forward instead of backward in the swing? 
I am particularly interested in this issue because I am about to move from 
Toronto (where the ballroom hold is firmly established) to an island off the 
coast of Vancouver (Bowen Island) where, if I want to continue to dance, I will 
have to start my own contra dance. This conversation has made me wonder whether 
I should start that group with the modified ballroom hold to solve many of 
these problems. I’d love to hear from others who have used this swing about the 
pros and cons (if any) and any other advice you’d have for someone starting a 
dance using this swing hold. 
Thanks!!Becky Liddle(Note: my email is changing from beckylid...@bell.net to 
becky.lid...@icloud.com )_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-le...@lists.sharedweight.net
  
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-le...@lists.sharedweight.net

Reply via email to