Yo!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gael Duval
> Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 6:25 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: David Faure
> Subject: Re: [Cooker] KOffice packages
>
>
> David Walluck a écrit :
> >
> > On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Gael Duval wrote:
> >
> > > I don't see what would prevent you to test/install the above koffice
> > > packages if you don't install KDE1!
> >
> > >
> > > If I misunderstood please _either_:
> > >
> > > - bash on me
> > > - re-explain differently
> >
> > It was my fault for not explaining clearly. I meant that is does require
> > kdelibs 2 and qt 2.1 (beta). I know that you do not need kdebase to use
> > it, but I figure if I am going to have to download kdelibs and
> qt (pretty
> > big for me), that I would download kdebse2, but only if I could
> use it in
> > place of KDE 1, and that's what I wanted to know.
>
> you need kdebase2 at least (and maybe kdesupport) - maybe David Faure
> could tell us more precisely ;)
>
Gael, i think kde support is only the header files and static libraries...so
i don't think you need htat to run kde stuff.
> I've tested the whole new KDE2 recently and it's usable. Not 100%
> stable, usable.
>
> Greets,
>
> Gael.
>
> --
> < Gael DUVAL - [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
> < http://www.mandrake.com >
>
Geoff.
