John Grange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Geoffrey Lee wrote:
>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ah, but not everyone likes qt ... one of them 's me ...because
> > > i think the
> > > > license really sucks...
> > > >
> > > > > Gael.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > < Gael DUVAL - [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
> > > > > < http://www.mandrake.com >
> > > > >
> > >
> > > qt is ok, but gtk is much better in many ways;)
> > >
> >
> > Nah, the QPL really sucks...even though that qt is now free software ...i
> > wouldn't use it unless absolutely necessary. you see a lot of software
> > vendors trying to embrace open source/free software in some way, but they're
> > too scared to use the GPL. ..
> >
> > gtk is cool. the best one is that it's LGPL. :-)
> >
>
> ok excuse My ignerence but what is the difference between GPL and LGPL? and
> other such licences is there a good place to go to find out the different
> licences and such
>
LGPL stand for "Library GPL" and allow a binary
program to link to a LGPL library.
--
-- Yoann, http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~yoann/
It is well known that M$ products don't call free() after a malloc().
The Unix community wish them good luck for their future developments.
