David Faure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well it should be fairly simple in theory: the menu system should only > deal with what it knows about, and leave untouched the .kdelnk or .desktop > files that come from external packages. > The current behaviour, instead, is quite ... aggressive. I suppose > this was to make the migration easier (deleting the existing kdelnk/desktop > files), but rpm -U could have done that instead, no ? The problem if we leave the user's files unchanged, is that we come with a menu completely screw up. -> entries at the root level, duplicate entries, "apps" and "applications" groups, etc.. -- Guillaume Cottenceau
- [Cooker] MIME types in KDE Gallagher
- Re: [Cooker] MIME types in KDE David Faure
- Re: [Cooker] MIME types in KDE Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] MIME types in KDE David Faure
- Re: [Cooker] MIME types in KDE Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] MIME types in KDE David Faure
- Re: [Cooker] MIME types in ... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] MIME types... David Faure
- Re: [Cooker] MIME types in ... David Aspinall
- Re: [Cooker] MIME types... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] MIME types... David Aspinall
- Re: [Cooker] MIME types in KDE Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] MIME types in KDE Denis HAVLIK
- Re: [Cooker] MIME types in KDE David Faure
- Re: [Cooker] MIME types in ... Daouda LO
- Re: [Cooker] MIME types in KDE Guillaume Cottenceau