> The current behaviour, instead, is quite ... aggressive. I suppose > this was to make the migration easier (deleting the existing kdelnk/desktop > files), but rpm -U could have done that instead, no ? I wondered why my system listed about a hundred missing .desktop files when I did rpm -Va Hmm, very naughty. And the wmconfig mechanism is thrown out? Redhat compatibility was a very useful asset, you shouldn't discard it willy nilly. All these bad changes make me think of switching back to plain RH. - D.
- [Cooker] MIME types in KDE Gallagher
- Re: [Cooker] MIME types in KDE David Faure
- Re: [Cooker] MIME types in KDE Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] MIME types in KDE David Faure
- Re: [Cooker] MIME types in KDE Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] MIME types in KDE David Faure
- Re: [Cooker] MIME types in ... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] MIME types... David Faure
- Re: [Cooker] MIME types in ... David Aspinall
- Re: [Cooker] MIME types... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] MIME types... David Aspinall
- Re: [Cooker] MIME types in KDE Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] MIME types in KDE Denis HAVLIK
- Re: [Cooker] MIME types in KDE David Faure
- Re: [Cooker] MIME types in ... Daouda LO
- Re: [Cooker] MIME types in KDE Guillaume Cottenceau