On Fri, 26 May 2000, Hoyt wrote: > With the current publicity about Win2k being shipped with LOTS of > bugs, shouldn't Mandrake get some good press for shipping with NONE? Having _no_ bugs is not possible. A distro that now takes up 2 CDs and includes code that wasn't written by MandrakeSoft guarantees that there will be some bugs. Hell, gcc and glibc have bugs, and everything is built on those. The bugs are built-in. :-) -- Stuart Krivis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fourth law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped
- Re: [Cooker] LS120 Denis HAVLIK
- Re: [Cooker] LS120 Civileme
- Re: [Cooker] LS120 Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] couple of bugs Lorne Shantz
- Re: [Cooker] couple of bugs Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] couple of bugs Lorne Shantz
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - Pay le... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - Pa... Hoyt
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - Pa... David Aspinall
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION ... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSS... David Aspinall
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DI... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION -Provide a sc... Hoyt
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION -Provide... Pablo Saratxaga
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION -Pro... Hoyt
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION ... Burkhard Zombronner
- Re: [Cooker] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION - Provide a b... Hoyt