Warly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >> I think changing to sasl2 in postfix was a bit premature, since the > >> dependencies are quite complex ... this is AFAIK how it works: > >> > >> Openldap, postfix, cyrus, should be compiled against the same libsasl. > >> Openldap, sasl should be compiled against the same version of db4, and > >> they Buildrequire each other. > > > > Since postfix will segfault if two different sasl versions are > > used together when using ldap, maybe sasl1 should be simply > > removed from cooker, what do you think warly? That way, it will > > prevent from "bad" bugreports of segfaults, and force people to > > rebuild faster :). > > > > Is there anything that should still badly need sasl1 in the 9.2? > > AFAIK we tried but failed for 9.1 cos of some Florin packages, Florin, can > you confirm?
openldap still depends on libsasl1 ... we will eventually upgrade openldap, make sure that everything works ... and maybe move sasl1 in the contribs or get rid of it ... -- Florin http://www.mandrakesoft.com http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~florin/
