Le mar 28/10/2003 à 13:40, Eric Fernandez a écrit : > Buchan Milne wrote: > > > > > > ><sarcasm> > >Yes, for an operating system that is intended to remove the need for > >Windows, the most critical feature is the version number on the software > >which you should never need to use after installing it. > > > >Maybe next time we should rather fix that than worrying about newer > >packages, fixing bugs etc? > ></sarcasm> > > > Buchan, I think you missed my point. I do not consider that version > number the most important thing in the distribution, and I appreciate > and recognise the quality of the work that everyone does here. If I > criticise Mandrake here, it is because I love it ! > I can understand that people who are disturbed by the fact they insert > the CD and read and mismatching version number. And yes this kind of > error has to be corrected, since it hurts Mandrake when you read a > review that will use the same <sarcasm> mode in his text about rushing > the release.
I agree totally with this. > An advice : remove completely that version number in the window title. > It is not necessary, and will prevent any error in the future. I subscript to that also. > For Stephane : I disagree there are a lot of bugs in the distro. The > fact that the updates are big in size does not mean there are a lot of > bugs. You may correct one little bug in KDe and anyway have to release > 100MB of updated rpm. May be i've been too strong with 'many' but actually updates are : 259M which is quite big for a 'stable' version. I'm contributing also to translation in French and i found many tiny bugs ... not very important in reality, but annoying, like milsleading translations in urpmi manual page, ... > Eric Stef --
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
