I meant that as far as changes in the way it behaves. It looks like a kde1
docked icon when viewed in kde2. ie up in the upper left corner and not down
in the taskbar. Unless it can be used in kde2 the way kicq can ( which is
stll broken in cvs the last i checked) then why bother enabling it, unless i
compiled the rpms wrong, which is possible.
On Friday 16 March 2001 10:51 pm, you wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 10:07:34PM -0500, Salane King wrote:
> > I rpm -bb the spec file for licq after changing the spec file to compile
> > ./configure --with-kde but no changes were noted still the same little
> > icon
>
> Are you sure? From ldd:
>
> [...]
> libGL.so.1 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1 (0x40a0c000)
> libXmu.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXmu.so.6 (0x40a72000)
> libXft.so.1 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.1 (0x40a89000)
> libjpeg.so.62 => /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62 (0x40aaf000)
> libmng.so.1 => /usr/lib/libmng.so.1 (0x40ad2000)
> /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x2aaaa000)
> libkio.so.3 => /usr/lib/libkio.so.3 (0x40b15000)
> libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x40ba9000)
> libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x40bc0000)
> libXt.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x40bc4000)
> libXrender.so.1 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0x40c17000)
> libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (0x40c1c000)
> libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0x40c5a000)
> libkdeui.so.3 => /usr/lib/libkdeui.so.3 (0x40c69000)
> libkdesu.so.1 => /usr/lib/libkdesu.so.1 (0x40e6e000)
> libkdecore.so.3 => /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.3 (0x40e91000)
> libutil.so.1 => /lib/libutil.so.1 (0x40fe7000)
> libkdefakes.so.3 => /usr/lib/libkdefakes.so.3 (0x40fea000)
> libDCOP.so.1 => /usr/lib/libDCOP.so.1 (0x40fec000)
> libpng.so.2 => /usr/lib/libpng.so.2 (0x41010000)
> snailtalk@ke qt-gui-1.0.3/src/.libs $
>
>
> So it requires a whole bunch of KDE libraries if I turn it on, now that
> is not nice for someone who doesn't isntall KDE. And I don't want people
> to install something like KDE just for Licq.
>
> Again, as I said, I'll think about making alternatives for Licq's Qt-gui
> client.
>
> Please understand that in this situation, I'm very reluctant to turn it on
> by default...
>
> > kind of like a kde1 dock icon being used in kde2. Any other suggestions
> >
> > On Friday 16 March 2001 09:11 pm, you wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 10:40:46AM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > > > Thanks I'll do it.
> > > > I agree with you. Why isn't it by default? Maybe like many of these
> > > > things as soon as they see these messages new RPMS will apper in
> > > > cooker ;-)
> > >
> > > Well --with-kde will definitely make non-KDE users unhappy ... I for
> > > example only have the Qt libraries here for Licq, and I don't have any
> > > KDE stuff on my box. All see about the alternative of compiling both
> > > ...
