Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Since 2.4, the situation has changed a bit. You now can have either > _no_ swap or swap > 2* phyisical memory, which would be 8GB. > Running the system with anything between that (0 < swapspace < 8GB for > you) is considered very bad now and the recommendation remains to > enable swap. please don't tell nonsense. having swap is always better, even if swapspace < memsize. a box running with xMB of swap in 2.2 may have some pb with 2.4 which wastes swap space for less swap fragmentation/better locality. so, when moving from 2.2 to 2.4, increasing your swap size may be a good idea. cu Pixel (who have 128MB of mem, and 100MB of swap and won't change this!)
- [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap space? James, Rick
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap space? Michael Brown
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap space? Arnd Bergmann
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap space? Eaon
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap space? Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap spa... J . A . Magallon
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap... Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need... J . A . Magallon
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap spa... diego
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap spa... Arnd Bergmann
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap... Greg A. Bur
- Re: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap space? Peter Ruskin
- RE: [Cooker] 4GB physical ram: need swap space? Marcel Pol