Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Since 2.4, the situation has changed a bit. You now can have either
> _no_ swap or swap > 2* phyisical memory, which would be 8GB.
> Running the system with anything between that (0 < swapspace < 8GB for 
> you) is considered very bad now and the recommendation remains to 
> enable swap.

please don't tell nonsense. having swap is always better, even if swapspace <
memsize.

a box running with xMB of swap in 2.2 may have some pb with 2.4 which wastes
swap space for less swap fragmentation/better locality.

so, when moving from 2.2 to 2.4, increasing your swap size may be a good idea.

cu Pixel (who have 128MB of mem, and 100MB of swap and won't change this!)

Reply via email to