--- Digital Wokan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reply-to did come through set to ASkwar. Would it be more proper to
> have the list override any user-supplied reply-to's?
>
> Alexander Skwar wrote:
> >
> > So sprach Eaon am Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 02:39:54PM -0600:
> > > But some emails still get through (OS, who sends from a compuserve
> account,
> > > sticks out in my mind) that for some reason don't get reply-to set
> properly.
> >
> > I suppose, that is, because OS sends his mails with a Reply-To: already
> > set. Let's see, I've set Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; if this mail has
> > a Reply-To not set to the list, than it's because of this.
That is exactly the point of my first post. The list must always override any
Reply-To fields in the incomming messages, and change the cooker address.
=====
________________________
Eugenio Diaz, BSEE/BSCE
Linux Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
