It does seem like a silly idea. If it's the third run at getting an RPM updated, it should be -3mdk, not -1.2mdk. Let's leave the dotted versions to the software and not the package attempts. Joe Menola wrote: > > I don't recall the use of decimals being used in versions of rpms. ( > > I assume xinetd-2.0.3-1.1mdk is newer then xinetd-2.0.3-1mdk? > > rpminst seems to think 2.0.3-1 is the newer file? > > -jm > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
- [Cooker] kdm broken? Andrej Borsenkow
- Re: [Cooker] kdm broken? guran
- [Cooker] rpm naming format has changed? Joe Menola
- Re: [Cooker] rpm naming format has chang... Digital Wokan
- Re: [Cooker] rpm naming format has c... Ben Reser
- Re: [Cooker] rpm naming format ... Vincent Danen
- Re: [Cooker] rpm naming format has c... David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] rpm naming format has c... Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] kdm broken? Joe Menola
- Re: [Cooker] kdm broken? Gary Lawrence Murphy
- Re: [Cooker] kdm broken? Frederic Lepied
- Re: [Cooker] kdm broken? Borsenkow Andrej
- Re: [Cooker] kdm broken? andre
- Re: [Cooker] kdm broken? David Walluck