Digital Wokan wrote: > It does seem like a silly idea. If it's the third run at getting an RPM > updated, it should be -3mdk, not -1.2mdk. Let's leave the dotted > versions to the software and not the package attempts. No, the .'s have a specific purpose, they're used only for security updates to specific stable packages. So it helps one to distinguish between a Cooker update and a Security update and a normal package. -- Sincerely, David Walluck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- [Cooker] kdm broken? Andrej Borsenkow
- Re: [Cooker] kdm broken? guran
- [Cooker] rpm naming format has changed? Joe Menola
- Re: [Cooker] rpm naming format has chang... Digital Wokan
- Re: [Cooker] rpm naming format has c... Ben Reser
- Re: [Cooker] rpm naming format ... Vincent Danen
- Re: [Cooker] rpm naming format has c... David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] rpm naming format has c... Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] kdm broken? Joe Menola
- Re: [Cooker] kdm broken? Gary Lawrence Murphy
- Re: [Cooker] kdm broken? Frederic Lepied
- Re: [Cooker] kdm broken? Borsenkow Andrej
- Re: [Cooker] kdm broken? andre
- Re: [Cooker] kdm broken? David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] kdm broken? andre
- Still broken in -6mdk Re: [Cooker] kdm b... Borsenkow Andrej