So sprach »Digital Wokan« am 2001-07-24 um 18:57:54 -0400 : > It does seem like a silly idea. If it's the third run at getting an RPM > updated, it should be -3mdk, not -1.2mdk. Let's leave the dotted > versions to the software and not the package attempts. Dotted versions are normally just security fixes. Alexander Skwar -- How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english) Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.iso-top.de iso-top.de - Die günstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen Uptime: 2 days 12 hours 50 minutes
- [Cooker] kdm broken? Andrej Borsenkow
- Re: [Cooker] kdm broken? guran
- [Cooker] rpm naming format has changed? Joe Menola
- Re: [Cooker] rpm naming format has chang... Digital Wokan
- Re: [Cooker] rpm naming format has c... Ben Reser
- Re: [Cooker] rpm naming format ... Vincent Danen
- Re: [Cooker] rpm naming format has c... David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] kdm broken? Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] kdm broken? Joe Menola
- Re: [Cooker] kdm broken? Gary Lawrence Murphy
- Re: [Cooker] kdm broken? Frederic Lepied
- Re: [Cooker] kdm broken? Borsenkow Andrej
- Re: [Cooker] kdm broken? andre
- Re: [Cooker] kdm broken? David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] kdm broken? andre
- Still broken in -6mdk Re: [Cooker] kdm b... Borsenkow Andrej