On Sun, 2002-05-19 at 14:28, Oden Eriksson wrote: > On Sundayen den 19 May 2002 19.49, OS wrote: > > Given the current state of hibernation on laptops (usually involving a > > Kernel panic due to NULL pointer exceptions) why on Earth would desktop > > users want to be subjected to that ! > > > > Owen > > > > On Friday 17 May 2002 2:34 pm, you wrote: > > > On Fridayen den 17 May 2002 12.47, Mattias Dahlberg wrote: > > > > On Fri, 17 May 2002, Borsenkow Andrej wrote: > > > > > I do not think hibernation is as useful and appealing for desktops > > > > > (it is targeted toward portables in the first place) but if you feel > > > > > like recompiling your kernel: > > > > > > > > I think hibernate is a killer feature for desktops. Not for servers, > > > > but definitely for desktops. > > > > > > I think so because it's mainly a desktop focused distro... I can't see > > > why we couldn't have this too when there's so much other fx candy > > > anyway... > > > > > > 1. patch the kernel. > > > 2. integrate it into userspace. > > If it works, fine, if not skip the hibernate stuff. It was merely an
i don't have the full email thread, but have a partial of it here. i believe we're commenting about teh "suspend to disk" feature. ..ditto, it is a "killer feature" and I would use it also, but it doesn't work with the XFS Filesystem from what i understand. would be a killer feature if you could use this feature with a the XFS Journalized Filesystem. It does, however, or may work with ext3 filesystem. > > -- > Regards // Oden Eriksson > -- Roger ----- Verify my pgp/gnupg signature on my HomePage: http://www.alltel.net/~rogerx/about/index.html
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
