Thierry Vignaud wrote: snip > also, the 486sx (at least the first ones) did has a coprocessor; it > was disabled but was still there (though i don't rember if it was > missing pins or some silicon hack). > > > actually, it was a bad bit of circuit if I remember correctly, the co pro was completely un-usable because of it and the cpu was a lower price for that reason. -- >>>>>> HTML MAIL GETS TRASHED WITHOUT BEING READ <<<<<<<<<<
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C3 process... James Sparenberg
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C3 processor Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C3 processor James Sparenberg
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C3 processor James Sparenberg
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C3 processor Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C3 processor Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C3 processor Levi Ramsey
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C3 processor Yura Gusev
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C3 process... Levi Ramsey
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C3 processor Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C3 process... J. Greenlees
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C3 pr... rowland
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C... Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C... Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C... rowland
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C... Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C... Digital Wokan
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C3 processor Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] VIA EPIA 800 C3 processor James Sparenberg