Thierry Vignaud wrote:
snip


> also, the 486sx (at least the first ones) did has a coprocessor; it
> was disabled but was still there (though i don't rember if it was
> missing pins or some silicon hack).
> 
> 
> 

actually, it was a bad bit of circuit if I remember correctly, the co 
pro was completely un-usable because of it and the cpu was a lower price 
for that reason.

-- 


 >>>>>> HTML MAIL GETS TRASHED WITHOUT BEING READ <<<<<<<<<<


Reply via email to