Got it to install here via the graphical method. by moving /mnt/lib/i686
to /mnt/lib/i686.no  On disk 3 and no problems so far.

James


On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 12:35, James Sparenberg wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 10:32, rowland wrote:
> > On Monday 07 October 2002 6:04 pm, you wrote:
> > this is what I had to do to install 9.0 onto a epia 800 C3 motherboard
> > 
> > do a text install, as packages start to install watch for glibc, when you see 
> > this, switch to console (alt + F2), type "rm -r /mnt/lib/i686" and press 
> > return/enter. It should now load normally. you should now switch back with 
> > alt+F1. Only problem is you don't get to choose which packages to load this 
> > way but I could not switch to console from graphical installation, is this 
> > another set of bugs/features?
> 
> You can switch just that I've always found that you have to go to ctrl
> alt f1 first.... the alt f2.  As for watching an app.  click details and
> you can see it happen just as in the text install.
> 
> > All this does beg the question, why does a distribution claiming to be i586 
> > compatible, have a directory named i686?
> 
> It's part of glibc and if you have a 686 cpu (like a celeron) it does
> get used for the kernel. (Even in RH they do this)
> 
> James
> 
> 
> 
> > rowland
> > > On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 07:58, Jose Antonio Becerra Permuy wrote:
> > > >         It seems that the problem is that glibc package from Mandrake 9.0 has
> > > > some libraries optimized for i686 (with the CMOV instruction) in the
> > > > directory /lib/i686 and that the Via C3 cpu (which has not that
> > > > instruction) is detected as i686. So, the solution is to delete that
> > > > directory as soon as possible, when the glibc package is installed, to
> > > > avoid programs use those libraries. I can't test this until saturday, so
> > > > if anybody else can test it (cc. to my e-mail address please).
> > > >         Regards.
> > >
> > > I can try tonight .... can you tell me how you would do this so I can be
> > > sure I'm doing it correctly.
> > >
> > > James
> > 
> 
> 
> 



Reply via email to