--- Alastair Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 19:09:44 -0700 (PDT) David > Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The only valid point I thought she was was her > > complaint about MCC being based on Gtk+1, but > that, > > like many of the other things she cried about has > > already been argued about on this list. > > Far from it, it's a weak point. gtk2 was new at the > time of the first beta > and the Mandrake tools catching up with it in their > own time was probably a > good decision. It's not as if they're the only > gtk[1] tools in the > distribution; by her logic Galeon, Evolution, > Sylpheed, the Gimp et alia > should be similarly criticised!
She meant it should be Qt and not Gtk+ > As a UI designer I find her reviews intensely > annoying. It's good that > _someone_ is focussing on the Linux desktop GUI, but > it's both what she says > and the way she says it (unprofessionally) that's > the problem ... Certainly, she likes to act like she's a usability expert, and she's not. __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com
