--- Han Boetes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gwenole Beauchesne ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > wrote: > > And who wrote this? Oh yes, Olivier. :) > > > > >How do you deal with this type of files, all are > packaged under %doc, > > >but rpm-build failed: (actually I `rm` it in > spec) > > > > rm it from where? Under $RPM_BUILD_ROOT? Then > that's normal, %doc file > > is not meant to have file "installed" under > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. > > > > So, if you have in your build dir, saysNEWS, > simply %doc NEWS, don't > > install it. This behavior hasn't changed. > > 14:29 mpol| duh, rpm now complains about files > which are installed but unpackaged > 14:29 mpol| I never ran into that before. it's > new? > 14:34 Han| mpol, indeed that is new. > 14:34 Han| The script it not so good. It > should just warn.
Agreed! __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site http://webhosting.yahoo.com
