On 06/19/2013 09:16 AM, Dirk Kostrewa wrote:
... and I've seen two different Coot mt leucine rotamers: the one that I've reported with Chi-angles -65, 51 (which would be closer to the mp rotamer), and one with Chi-angles -65, -60 (which would be mm). Apparently, Coot changes something else. Anyway, I'm still missing the correct mt rotamer with Chi angles -65, 175.
Do you accept or reject nomenclature error correction when you read in the coordinates?
