I stand corrected - Bill Scott's main page is down, but the index of stand-alone coot packages is still available at:
http://psbmini.ucsc.edu/~wgscott/coot/ On Tue, 31 Dec 2013 16:31:03 +0000, Oliver Clarke <olibcla...@gmail.com> wrote: >That was fast! Thanks Paul, I'll try it out. Bill Scott's webpage (my usual >source of nightly builds) has been down for several days, so I'll try to build >it myself from source - I recall that being a little bit of a finicky process >on OS X last time I tried, but hopefully I'll manage. > >Another note - what is active_atom_spec() supposed to do? I guessed it was an >equivalent of active_residue() but returning the specific atom rather than the >CA, but it returns this when called: > >_90ac6c78c97f0000_p_std__pairT_bool_std__pairT_int_coot__atom_spec_t_t_t > >While pushing the following to the console: >BL INFO:: command input is: active_atom_spec() >BL INFO:: result is <Swig Object of type 'std::pair< bool,std::pair< >int,coot::atom_spec_t > > *' at 0x10c8cda50> >swig/python detected a memory leak of type 'std::pair< bool,std::pair< >int,coot::atom_spec_t > > *', no destructor found. > >Oliver. > >On Tue, 31 Dec 2013 10:04:53 +0000, Paul Emsley <pems...@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk> >wrote: > >>On 31/12/13 01:32, Paul Emsley wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> to check for a matching chain, but the output of >>>> align_to_closest_chain() is either 0 or 1. >>>> >>>> The matching chain id is present in the console output, but I haven�t >>>> yet figured out how to parse that and do anything useful with it - >>>> the console output does not seem be easily accessible via either >>>> stdout or stderr (was hoping I could redirect the console output to a >>>> file and grep it for the chain id - ugly but I don�t know a better way). >>> >>> OK, that's a good point. >>> >>> So the policy is that interesting variables/values should be returned >>> by functions. In this case it would be good to know the selected >>> chain-id, but you don't get that - so that's a problem. I'll fix that >>> now. In future this function will return False or the molecule number >>> and chain-id. >>> >>> >> >>OK, look out for revision 4867. >> >>Regards, >> >>Paul.
