On Tue, 2021-06-15 at 11:07 +0100, Phong Nguyen wrote: > > Upping the weight on the Rama restraints doesn´t help in my case. I think the > problem come from the interface because > if I turn on the validation ramachandran, it shows that the outliers come in > favoured regions after refinement using > rama restraints. So basically the refinement works well just some wrong > signals.
Hmm... OK, noted. Which residue type was that? > > > There are two types of target function for the Ramachandran restraints. You > > might like to try the other one: > > set_refine_ramachandran_restraints_type(0) # pythonically speaking > > how can I do it? Calculate -> Scripting -> Python or add it to startup.py in you ~/.coot-preferences directory (make the file if needed) if you want it for every session. Paul. ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the COOT list, click the following link: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/WA-JISC.exe?SUBED1=COOT&A=1 This message was issued to members of www.jiscmail.ac.uk/COOT, a mailing list hosted by www.jiscmail.ac.uk, terms & conditions are available at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/