Martin Buchholz wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 15:48, Joe Darcy<joe.da...@sun.com> wrote:
On 09/09/09 08:01 PM, Joe Darcy wrote:
I noticed that the Character class should be similarly tightened:
Right you are. Webrev regenerated.
Martin
One typo inherited from my earlier suggestion (mea culpa!): as the
Character class is not a java.lang.Number, it does not have an intValue
method. Character does have a charValue method and referring to that
method in the specification of hashCode should suffice.
I approve this change going back with the correction to the Character class.
Thanks,
-Joe
