On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 16:48, Joe Darcy<joe.da...@sun.com> wrote: > Martin Buchholz wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 15:48, Joe Darcy<joe.da...@sun.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 09/09/09 08:01 PM, Joe Darcy wrote: >>> I noticed that the Character class should be similarly tightened: >>> >> >> Right you are. Webrev regenerated. >> >> Martin >> > > One typo inherited from my earlier suggestion (mea culpa!): as the Character > class is not a java.lang.Number, it does not have an intValue method. > Character does have a charValue method and referring to that method in the > specification of hashCode should suffice. > > I approve this change going back with the correction to the Character class.
Oops! so many little mistakes. Webrev regenerated. Martin
