Martin Buchholz wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 16:48, Joe Darcy<joe.da...@sun.com> wrote:
Martin Buchholz wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 15:48, Joe Darcy<joe.da...@sun.com> wrote:
On 09/09/09 08:01 PM, Joe Darcy wrote:
I noticed that the Character class should be similarly tightened:
Right you are. Webrev regenerated.
Martin
One typo inherited from my earlier suggestion (mea culpa!): as the Character
class is not a java.lang.Number, it does not have an intValue method.
Character does have a charValue method and referring to that method in the
specification of hashCode should suffice.
I approve this change going back with the correction to the Character class.
Oops! so many little mistakes. Webrev regenerated.
Looks good.
-Joe
