Two repositories use this drops mechanism, jaxp and jaxws, when both are changed, I will address the readme file.
-kto On Dec 28, 2011, at 10:00 AM, Gary Adams wrote: > I see in the webrev the removal of drops.dir from the ant build.xml. > Should similar updates be applied to README-builds.html for > ALT_DROPS_DIR and ALLOW_DOWNLOADS? > > Might be good to put a note in > $(ALT_JDK_DEVTOOLS_PATH)/share/jdk8-drops > indicating the files are now include directly > in the jdk8 repos. > > On 12/28/11 12:18 PM, Joe Wang wrote: >> On 12/28/2011 2:56 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: >>> On 23/12/2011 21:27, Joe Wang wrote: >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> We have prepared a jaxp update for 7u4. The listed changes have been >>>> posted to the jdk7u-dev alias with "7u4 Request for approval for CR >>>> 7121110 - JAXP 1.4.5 update 1 for 7u4". >>>> >>>> With this update, we are adding jaxp sources back into the jdk7 >>>> repository, which means we are abandoning the jaxp bundle download >>>> process. This is a significant change. We'd like to hear if you have any >>>> concerns. If no objection, we'd like to push the change within the next >>>> week. >>>> >>>> The webrev is here: >>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~joehw/jaxp145u1-changeset/webrev/ >>> This is good news. So what about jdk8? I think the protocol with 7u is that >>> changes go into 8 first. Also are you expecting to keep the code in 7u and >>> 8 in sync? >> Kelly asked for 6-open and jdk8 as well. Since we're changing the jaxp >> bundle process, we thought we would do the same for 6-open and jdk8 once >> this works out. But we can take the change to jdk8 first if this is >> approved. The only question I had was that the jdk8 modularization would >> change the jaxp source structure. But Kelly thought that's not a problem. I >> guess we don't mind another big changeset :) >> >> -Joe >> >>> >>> -Alan. >