Hello all; I have posted an updated version of the empty ArrayList and HashMap patch.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/JDK-7143928/1/webrev/ This revised implementation introduces *no new fields* to either class. For ArrayList the lazy allocation of the backing array occurs only if the list is created at default size. According to our performance analysis team, approximately 85% of ArrayList instances are created at default size so this optimization will be valid for an overwhelming majority of cases. For HashMap, creative use is made of the threshold field to track the requested initial size until the bucket array is needed. On the read side the empty map case is tested with isEmpty(). On the write size a comparison of (table == EMPTY_TABLE) is used to detect the need to inflate the bucket array. In readObject there's a little more work to try to choose an efficient initial capacity. Mike On Mar 26 2013, at 17:25 , Mike Duigou wrote: > Hello all; > > This is a review for optimization work that came out of internal analysis of > Oracle's Java applications. It's based upon analysis that shows that in large > applications as much as 10% of maps and lists are initialized but never > receive any entries. A smaller number spend a large proportion of their > lifetime empty. We've found similar results across other workloads as well. > This patch is not a substitute for pre-sizing your collections and > maps--doing so will *always* have better results. > > This patch extends HashMap and ArrayList to provide special handling for > newly created instances that avoids creating the backing array until needed. > There is a very small additional cost for detecting when to inflate the map > or list that is measurable in interpreted tests but disappears in JITed code. > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/JDK-7143928/0/webrev/ > > We expect that should this code prove successful in Java 8 it will be > backported to Java 7 updates. > > The unit test may appear to be somewhat unrelated. It was created after > resolving a bug in an early version of this patch to detect the issue > encountered (LinkedHashMap.init() was not being called in readObject() when > the map was empty). > > Mike
