That is fine by me. If any one on awt-dev knows of a reason to keep it
they should speak up.
-phil.
On 9/15/15 5:09 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
We would be entirely happy if the environment frobbing code were to be
deleted.
Should I change my code to do that?
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Phil Race <philip.r...@oracle.com
<mailto:philip.r...@oracle.com>> wrote:
I don't understand that original assessment.
Switching to XAWT had no impact on this code except to make it
pointless.
i.e it did not prevent its execution.
I doubt there is any code left in the JDK that will derive any
benefit from it still being there. All CDE/Motif & Xt related code
is gone.
This should have been removed along with it but was doubtless not
in plain sight to whoever did that.
So unless I am missing something you could go further and just
delete it.
-phil.
On 9/15/2015 3:13 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
I reported this bug 12 years ago, but it was closed Will Not
Fix, and this year I see java programs crashing because of it!
This is a partial fix.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8136570
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-4953367
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk9/usr-dt-environment/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Emartin/webrevs/openjdk9/usr-dt-environment/>
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Emartin/webrevs/openjdk9/usr-dt-environment/>
