Mostly moot, now that we have consensus on just deleting these entirely,
but my (original) code was safer because it calls putenv in fewer cases.
Who knows what /usr/dt is "supposed" to look like these days? "Common"
Desktop Environment not so "common" anymore...
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 1:33 AM, Thomas Stüfe <thomas.stu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> would it be not sufficient to just test for existence of /usr/dt before
> the two calls to setPathEnvironment() and leave the rest as it is? I also
> think the intend would be clearer ("only call this if CDE is installed").
>
> Kind Regards, Thomas
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:13 AM, Martin Buchholz <marti...@google.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I reported this bug 12 years ago, but it was closed Will Not Fix, and this
>> year I see java programs crashing because of it!
>> This is a partial fix.
>>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8136570
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-4953367
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk9/usr-dt-environment/
>>
>
>
