> On 30 Sep 2015, at 16:13, Remi Forax <fo...@univ-mlv.fr> wrote: > > > > ----- Mail original ----- >> De: "Paul Benedict" <pbened...@apache.org> >> À: "Peter Levart" <peter.lev...@gmail.com> >> Cc: "core-libs-dev" <core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net> >> Envoyé: Mercredi 30 Septembre 2015 16:06:18 >> Objet: Re: RFR 8135248: Add utility methods to check indexes and ranges >> >> Ah, I was going to write about "values" ... glad this was mentioned. With >> Valhalla working on value classes, it does raise the question if >> range-checking is particular to Objects. Clearly it won't be once values >> are introduced. >> >> PS: I am still in favor of using Objects at the time being though just to >> get something checked-in. > > I am in favor of Objects too, > but I think the name (oh no bikeshedding again) should start with require* > too make it clear that it goes with requireNonNull > > 'requireIndexInBounds' anyone ? >
For now i am gonna commit what i currently have, and we could revisit the naming later on if necessary, but for now i will trade you the painting of this bike shed for another on Optional.or that kick start in another email (probably tomorrow). Paul.
