On 28/07/2016 11:22, Chris Hegarty wrote:

[ switching to 8157570 as it better describes the issue, rather than the affect 
]


Looks good to me Chris.
Another possibility might be to use InnocuousThread?
Good idea Daniel. I updated the webrev to use InnocuousThread, and
added an assert, since this is no test.

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8157570/


This looks much better and looks good to me. Separately, should the thread name be "RMI GC Daemon" to make it a bit clearer in thread dumps.

-Alan

Reply via email to