Hi Chris,
Looks good to me!
best regards,
-- daniel
On 28/07/16 12:40, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 28 Jul 2016, at 12:28, Alan Bateman <[email protected]> wrote:
On 28/07/2016 11:22, Chris Hegarty wrote:
[ switching to 8157570 as it better describes the issue, rather than the affect
]
Looks good to me Chris.
Another possibility might be to use InnocuousThread?
Good idea Daniel. I updated the webrev to use InnocuousThread, and
added an assert, since this is no test.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8157570/
This looks much better and looks good to me. Separately, should the thread name be
"RMI GC Daemon" to make it a bit clearer in thread dumps.
Thanks for the review Alan. Webrev updated in-place
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8157570/
-Chris.
