On 28 Jul 2016, at 12:28, Alan Bateman <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 28/07/2016 11:22, Chris Hegarty wrote: > >> [ switching to 8157570 as it better describes the issue, rather than the >> affect ] >> >> >>> Looks good to me Chris. >>> Another possibility might be to use InnocuousThread? >> Good idea Daniel. I updated the webrev to use InnocuousThread, and >> added an assert, since this is no test. >> >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8157570/ >> >> > This looks much better and looks good to me. Separately, should the thread > name be "RMI GC Daemon" to make it a bit clearer in thread dumps.
Thanks for the review Alan. Webrev updated in-place http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8157570/ -Chris.
