On 03/12/2017 07:55 PM, Hans Boehm wrote:
But I think we agree that it doesn't matter for this discussion; neither of these problems are addressed by deprecating finalizers. PhantomReferences have exactly the same issues. ...
The motivation seems more along the lines of "denigration" vs deprecation. But even if so, I agree with Hans's implicit claim that it might be better to thoroughly document all the issues encountered when using finalization and/or PhantomReferences and/or cleaners, etc. This coverage will necessarily convey the high expertise required to implement and use them effectively, and to not use them otherwise. Currently no single authoritative account exists, so a lot of errors are due to confusion or ignorance. Doing better would seem to be the highest priority. But maybe adding deprecation warnings on top of this will have some beneficial effect. So, like Hans, I'm not completely opposed to this, but not excited either. -Doug
